Five Strategies to Cultivate University Reputation

The reputational crisis of many universities is a crisis of identity, writes Santiago Fernández-Gubieda. Here, he explains that reputation starts within the organisation, and offers five actions to foster public trust in universities.

Like a triangle, reputation has three sides: integrating stakeholders, contributing to the overall environment, and preserving institutional integrity from any interference. 

In these turbulent times, reputation is key for universities and their leadership, even as surveys from the US to Australia suggest public confidence in higher education is falling. Changes in technology, de-globalisation, geopolitical tensions, and debate around institutional neutrality and free speech mean that university leaders have fewer certainties when asking how their institutions gain society’s trust. 

Perhaps the key lies in how we have understood university reputation until now.

Let me be clear: reputation should be a principle of governance aimed at preserving the integrity of universities. It is a complex reality that integrates three perspectives: an inside-out approach, an outside-in approach, and a co-creation of a value environment approach. This reputation triangle may seem theoretical, but it explains some of the current crises. The three approaches are:

Historically, managing university (and corporate) reputation has prioritised stakeholder management and adaptability to the context, neglecting the first, and possibly most important, approach: that reputation is born and cultivated within the organisation and expressed outwardly. The reputational crisis of many universities is a crisis of identity: what is the unique and credible purpose that makes us distinguishable? How do we protect our professors’ intellectual work above market interests (whether capital or ideas)? How do we safeguard our universities’ integrity against external forces?

Universities must integrate the voices of all their stakeholders in order to be more open and inclusive, but they must also remember the purpose for which they were founded: to transmit and generate knowledge, preserve the free circulation of ideas, and promote the holistic growth of their students. It is the task of university governance to seek a balanced pursuit of the three reputation approaches.

Principles should inspire governance and illuminate practice. Reputation as a principle of governance must include an operational model that allows for institutional improvement. Reputation management requires professional capabilities, new functions and intentional actions. 

Strategies to support university reputation

Here are five strategies to guide an operational model for university reputation led by the governance team:

Clarify the university’s purpose 

Embrace interdisciplinarity

Practise strategic communication

Create governance and culture that listen

Be sensitive to contextual intelligence

From this perspective, reputation is the most valuable intangible endowment of universities, ensuring their long-term sustainability; it is a strategic asset resulting from honest, coherent and well-communicated behaviour, which will continue to bear fruitful outcomes for their future.

Santiago Fernández-Gubieda is chief reputation officer at the University of Navarra, Spain. He writes on university reputation at his blog: https://universityreputation.es

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top